Inventio
creative thinking about learning and teaching
February 1999 Vol 1, No 1In this IssueAbout InventioEditorial Board
Is George Mason a Learning-Centered University?
David L. Potter
 

© Copyright 1998-99 by David L. Potter (dpotter@gmu.eduThe right to make additional exact copies, including this notice, for personal and classroom use, is hereby granted. All other forms of distribution and copying require permission of the author.

 

Section Four: The Role of Research

The role of research and scholarship and its relationship to learning also may be problematic, although the purpose of research is to create new knowledge and thereby to contribute to higher learning. The research enterprise often is vulnerable to the criticism that we are talking to ourselves, sharing our new learning with a small group of specialists who already know most of what we have to say. How can we make new knowledge more accessible and communicate it more effectively   to others; how can we apply it to teaching and learning, to audiences in the broader society? How can we integrate more directly faculty scholarship and student learning, with respect to both its educational and its apprenticeship aspects?

One contribution that research can make more directly to learning is to engage in a new form of scholarship, marshalling what we know about learning as a process and applying it to the education of our students.  We might envision faculty as engaged in dual scholarship, expected to be deep scholars of their respective disciplines, informed scholars of learning. Advances in several disciplines, for example neuroscience, brain research, artificial intelligence, the social sciences, educational psychology and others, are becoming available to inform and enrich our understanding of human learning. These findings, combined with our wisdom and experience as educators and with the results of recent documented successful educational reforms, can be our reference point. We need to engage with these disciplines and these other sources of knowledge about learning, and to incorporate them into our work and institutional cultures. In doing so, we need to transcend the knowledge of individuals to achieve more collective learning goals and understandings that we can accumulate and use. We need to draw on these findings to inform our pedagogy, curricula, and learning environments, and to define and refine the assessment of learning and the nature of our work.

Next Section: What Do We Know about Learning?

Previous Section: Implications for Faculty Work