Fall 2006
|
|||
| (Mis)Trusting Technology that Polices Integrity: A Critical Assessment of Turnitin.com | |||
by: |
However, the position that students may unintentionally plagiarize as they learn to work through and understand difficult texts, engage them in substantive ways, and then construct their own writing about them does not address the other extreme, the unethical intent to plagiarize. For example, many would argue that students who download papers wholesale from the Internet demonstrate dishonesty, regardless of the causes for such an action, and that they must be punished. My argument, though, is that intent should not change our pedagogical response. Students will plagiarize. Let's use the short time we have with them to address the problems leading to plagiarism rather than using it to police them and name them transgressor right from the start. Let's focus on helping students learn what it means to engage with their sources. Let's work with them through the entire writing process, which includes making sure they are learning effective reading strategies. Let's teach engagement with sources through class discussion, reading responses, comments on drafts that point to the ways they need to engage more deeply, and final comments on products that model engagement by engaging them as writers themselves. Any downloaded draft, then, would just become part of the invention stages of a writing project. If teachers don't allow students to shirk engagement, the extreme forms of plagiarism will disappear, and as students engage sources more and more, the lesser forms of it will be transformed into acceptable, sophisticated patchwriting.
|
|
|
![]() |
DoIT...supporting excellence in learning and teaching. | ![]() |
|
| Send questions and comments to: | |||
| |
|||
| |
|||