Fall 2006
|
|||
| (Mis)Trusting Technology that Polices Integrity: A Critical Assessment of Turnitin.com | |||
by: |
Sherman argues that "academic integrity cannot be coerced, nor can it be taught except by example and the rigorous inculcation of a code of honor that is then internalized" (p. 91). The fact is that students today (even, as "Thompson" shows us, the most advanced doctoral candidates) don't necessarily have adequate models of integrity. The news is rife with accounts of misconduct at the highest levels:
These examples and the very existence, much less institutional adoption of, plagiarism prevention software communicates an open acknowledgement of rampant plagiarism and an assumption of guilt. Americans acknowledge that we live in a time of decreased integrity. As a humanist, I believe that the solution must extend beyond the catch-and-punish phase. If I continue to use plagiarism prevention software, I will do so as a part of a comprehensive pedagogical approach to academic integrity. We must prevent the behavior from the start, not by requiring students to run their work through the intellectual equivalent of a metal detector; we must instill, foster, and inspire an ethos of academic integrity. We must call to account, even if only as classroom examples, these examples of misconduct we see in the larger society.
|
|
|
![]() |
DoIT...supporting excellence in learning and teaching. | ![]() |
|
| Send questions and comments to: | |||
| |
|||
| |
|||